Skip to main content
Image
Lake

The Hill | House Dem Criticizes Abortion, Immigration Language in DHS Spending Bill

June 6, 2012

House Dem Criticizes Abortion, Immigration Language in DHS Spending Bill
By Pete Kasperowicz | The Hill | June 6, 2012

Rep. David Price (D-N.C.) criticized the 2013 Department of Homeland Security (DHS) spending bill on Thursday because it includes language that prevents the department from spending money on abortion, language that Price said simply repeats current law but is also needlessly inflammatory.

"They seem designed mostly for political effect, but I tell you, political effect cuts both ways," Price said on the floor of the abortion language. "These abortion riders, while unnecessary, are inflammatory. They're divisive. They should not be included in the final bill.

"Until now, our bill has never touched on the issue of abortion," added Price, who is the ranking member of the House Appropriations subcommittee on Homeland Security.

Price also criticized language that requires DHS to maintain at least 34,000 "detention beds" for illegal immigrants, which he said was "arbitrary" and could lead to wasted taxpayer dollars if fewer beds are needed.

Rep. Robert Aderholt (R-Ala.), who chairs the subcommittee, defended the immigration language as necessary given the relaxed Obama administration stance on immigration enforcement.

"In response to the administration's repeated attempts to water down enforcement, this bill directs ICE to maintain 34,000 detention beds," Aderholt said. "Our subcommittee is serious about compelling the Department to not only enforce the law, but to comply with the law as well, and we cannot tolerate further failures in this regard."

Aderholt also proposed the abortion amendment that Price complained about, although he did not speak about this change on the House floor.

House began debate on the DHS spending bill, H.R. 5855, on Wednesday afternoon, and was expected to debate various amendments into the evening.

The bill spends $39.1 billion, nearly $500 million less than last year. Much of those savings come from a nearly $200 million cut to the Transportation Security Administration.

If you would like to read this article online, click here.